Legal Opinion

Woods v. City of Hobbs

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1965No. 7714PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

Despite the fact that seven points are asserted as error, this appeal turns upon the validity of a written release executed by the plaintiff to his employer and its insurance carrier releasing them from all liability for workmen’s compensation benefits in consideration of the payment to him of $5,000.00 and certain medical and hospital payments.

James L. Woods, an employee of the City of Hobbs, sustained an accidental - injury on September 12, 1962, arising out of and in the course of his employmént. He continued to work and to draw his wages of $86.00 per week until June 5,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. ZaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Karn Et Ux v. Pidcock Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Thomas v. Barber's Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hendren v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Register v. Roberson Const. Co., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Betts v. Tom Wade GinTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Smith v. LoosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API