Legal Opinion

Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1929PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

This is a suit in equity to rescind two contracts for the purchase of two lots in the city of Portland and to recover $362.50 paid thereon. The stipulated price of the two lots was $775 and $675, respectively, of which plaintiff paid at the time of entering into the contracts the sums of $193.75 and $168.75. The balance of the purchase price, with interest, was, by the terms of the contracts, made payable in stated monthly instalments.

The grounds upon which the alleged right to rescission is based, as alleged in the complaint, are that plaintiff was induced to enter into the contracts and to…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API