Legal Opinion
Costandi v. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1972No. 24842PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs (franchisees) brought this action against the defendant, AAM-CO Automatic Transmissions, Inc., franchisor (AAMCO), seeking damages for alleged' violations of the anti-trust laws of the United States; for restitution based upon fraud which induced the franchisees to enter into franchising agreements with AAMCO; and recovery for unjust enrichment.
AAMCO cross-complained alleging breach of the franchise agreements; seeking to have the franchise agreements terminated; seeking damages as a result of said breaches; and seeking an injunction against the franchisees to prevent them from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Karn Et Ux v. Pidcock Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- County of Alameda v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.