Legal Opinion

Scott v. Walton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1898PublishedCited by 82 opinions

From Josephine: Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. Suit by B. F. Scott against J. D. Walton and wife ■to compel defendants to rescind a sale, and to cancel the deed made by plaintiff to defendants. From a decree against him plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a suit to cancel a deed on the ground of fraud. The facts are that on April 15, 1893, the plaintiff traded to the defendant a farm in Josephine County and certain personal property thereon for a dwelling house and two lots in Lebanon, Linn County. The trade proceeded upon the basis that the respective properties were of equal value, but the Lebanon property was incumbered by a mortgage to secure the payment of $900, due December, 1894; and to indemnify the plaintiff against such mortgage the defendant assigned and transferred to him a promissory note of date March 8, 1893, on Wilson &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Marston v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Van De Wiele v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Breshears v. CallenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API