Legal Opinion

Hakes v. Paul

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue present upon this appeal is whether the complaint alleges a cause of action for damages caused by the negligent operation, management or control of a motor vehicle within the meaning of sec. 260.11 (1), Stats., so as to permit the insurance carrier to be named as a party defendant in the action.

The direct-action statutes as they apply to the issue at hand are:

Sec. 204.30 (4) “Any bond or policy of insurance covering liability to others by reason of the operation of a motor vehicle shall be deemed and construed to contain the following conditions: That the insurer shall be liable to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smedley v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Snorek v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Norton v. HuismanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rice v. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hasselstrom v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lemon v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  4. Farmers Mutual Insurance v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. Carey, New York County Courts1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API