Legal Opinion

Olson v. Farrar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2012No. 2009AP2385PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. Mt. Morris Mutual Insurance Company seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals reversing the circuit court's grant of a declaratory and summary judgment in its favor.1 Todd Olson filed suit against Robert Farrar, alleging he was liable for property damage to Olson's trailer home and vehicle. Farrar's insurer, Mt. Morris, sought a declaration that it had neither a duty to defend nor a duty to indemnify Farrar under the terms of its insurance policy.

¶ 2. Mt. Morris contends that under the four-corners rule, the court should resolve this dispute with reference to the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Newhouse Ex Rel. Skow v. Citizens Security Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Grieb v. Citizens Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Water Well Solutions Service Group Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. David M. Marks v. Houston Casualty CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Archie A. Talley v. Mustafa MustafaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Lindsey Dostal v. Curtis StrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Bethke v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API