Legal Opinion

Smedley v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The appellant raises five assignments of error. The first assignment is the error of the court in denying the plea in abatement and raises the question whether the Insurance Company can be made a party defendant by virtue of sec. 260.11 (1), Stats., 30 W. S. A., p. 39. This section applies to an action for damages caused by the negligent operation, management or control of a motor vehicle. In construing this section, we must also consider sec. 204.30 (4), 25 W. S. A., p. 310. This latter section creates direct liability to others than the insured on the part of the insurer of a bond or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Papke v. HaerleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wiedenhaupt v. Van Der LoopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schmidt v. LuchterhandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Frye v. AngstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Waldbillig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API