Legal Opinion

Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Fischer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The policy issued by the defendant contained the usual “no-action” clause providing that:

“No action shall lie against the company . . . until the amount of the insured’s obligation to pay shall have been finally determined either by judgment against the insured after actual trial or by written agreement of the insured, the claimant and the company. . . . Nothing contained in this policy shall give any person or organization any right to join the company as a co-defendant in any action against the insured to determine the insured’s liability.”

The legislature, however, has seen fit to make…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Truesdill v. RoachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Frye v. AngstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wiedenhaupt v. Van Der LoopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hakes v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graf v. BloechlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hasselstrom v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jack W. Turner v. Ronald Marvin PflugerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API