Hasselstrom v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.

The issues presented are as follows:(1) Was Royal Indemnity’s motion for summary judgment defective because the affidavit supporting the motion failed to incorporate the entire insurance policy?(2) Can Royal Indemnity be made a party to the action under the terms of its policy by virtue of the direct-action statute, sec. 260.11 (1), as it existed at the time of the accident?(3) Can the 1967 and 1969 amendments to the direct-action statute be applied retroactively?

The only part of the insurance policy made a part of the motion for summary judgment was a quotation of the no-action clause in the…