In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Rudie
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar charged the accused, a member of the Bar, with disciplinary violations arising out of three separate episodes. The Bar’s complaint stated eleven causes of complaint. Four of these were amended by leave of the trial board. With respect to four others the accused admitted the charge but pleaded mitigation. The trial board found the accused guilty of one of the other charges, the first. The Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not guilty of the first charge but found him guilty of the tenth charge. To avoid needless complexity, we deal with the episodes giving rise to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GeurtsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint of KneelandOregon Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of OdmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RudieOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000