Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Rudie
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1983No. OSB 81-42, SC 28951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The primary issue is the appropriate sanction to be imposed for conduct of the accused that was in violation of certain disciplinary rules contained in the Code of Professional Conduct.
The following facts are taken from the accused’s brief in this court:
“The accused at the time of trial of the Hoekstre matter was 29 years of age, had been admitted to practice law in the State of Oregon in 1975 and engaged in the practice of law in Salem, Oregon. After undertaking to represent Bert W. Harrison and Golden B Products, Inc. in a lawsuit filed against them by Frank D. Hoekstre and Shirley E.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LoewOregon Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ArbuckleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983