Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Odman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1984No. OSB 81-30; SC S30429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary matter in which the accused, Dennis Odman, was charged with violating three disciplinary rules in connection with his representation of the estate of Mr. Echeverría: DR 5-105 (conflict of interest); 1 DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter); and DR 6-101(A)(l) (lack of competence). The Trial Board found the accused not guilty of the conflict of interest and lack of competence charges, but guilty of neglect of a legal matter. The Disciplinary Review Board found him guilty of all three charges and recommended this court publicly reprimand the accused. We review the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GeurtsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KinseyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RudieOregon Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API