Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1979No. 1434 SC 25676PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of accused’s neglect and negligence in handling his clients’ legal problems.

The matter was heard by the Trial Board on written stipulations of facts together with testimony from the complainant and the accused.

The accused’s answer admitted the basic allegations of the Oregon State Bar’s complaint; that he was dilatory and negligent in performing required and agreed legal services to his client; that such action on his part "was detrimental to the honor and integrity of the profession.”

The only question raised by the briefs and record before this court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HollingsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CorcoranOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. CauseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GeurtsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API