Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Geurts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1980No. OSB 79-10, SC 27175PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar brought two disciplinary charges against the accused, Glenn A. Geurts. One cause of complaint was that the accused neglected a legal matter entrusted to him by a client. The second charge was that the accused failed to respond to the Bar’s inquiry concerning the complaint that gave rise to the first charge. A trial board found the accused guilty of the first charge and not guilty of the second charge. It recommended that the accused be reprimanded and suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. The Disciplinary Review Board found the accused guilty of both charges and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ArbuckleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API