Legal Opinion
Economic Empowerment Foundation v. Quackenbush
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 9, 1997No. A072693PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANLON, J.
The Economic Empowerment Foundation (EEF) appeals from an order dismissing its complaint and petition for mandate against defendant and respondent Charles Quackenbush, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (Commissioner), and real party in interest and respondent the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies (Farmers), after respondents’ demurrers to the complaint and petition were sustained without leave to amend. EEF seeks an award, payable by Farmers, of fees and expenses EEF incurred representing the interests of consumers in proceedings before the Department of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees of Saint Agnes Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.