Legal Opinion

Prescan v. Aliquippa & Southern Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1954No. Civ. No. 12285PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In this proceeding which arises under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the sole problem presented to the court relates to the proper application of the discovery process. Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.

The plaintiff through his counsel has submitted to the defendant the following interrogatory:

“12. State the acts of omission or commission on the part of the plaintiff referred to in the second defense of the defendant’s Answer and which were said to have been the sole or contributing cause of the accident.”

Defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Gutowitz v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Ryan v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  4. Bush v. SkidisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
  5. Martz v. AbbottDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SelbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
  2. Lance, Inc. v. GinsburgDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Kyker v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  4. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. May v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API