Legal Opinion

May v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 17, 1955No. 7845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, District Judge.

In this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., defendant’s answer alleged that “plaintiff was guilty of negligence contributing to the occurrence of the accident”. Plaintiff filed the following Interrogatory, among others:

“11. State in detail the alleged negligence on the part of the Plaintiff contributing to the occurrence of the accident and give the names and addresses of any witness to the alleged acts of contributory negligence on the part of the Plaintiff.”

Defendant excepted to this Interrogatory on the ground that “the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
  3. Gutowitz v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Prescan v. Aliquippa & Southern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McElroy v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  2. Buining v. the TransporterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  3. Jones v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
  4. Bell v. Novick Transfer Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API