Legal Opinion

Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1955No. Civ. A. 12820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

This case is before the court upon (1) defendant’s motion to strike portions of the complaint, (2) defendant’s motion for more definite statement, (3) defendant’s motion to dismiss, (4) defendant’s objection to request for admissions, (5) defendant’s objection to interrogatories, and (6) plaintiff’s motion for a protective order against defendant’s taking plaintiff’s deposition.

The court’s jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and the amount in controversy. The complaint was filed October 30, 1954. The following facts appear from the complaint, as amended.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Goodwin v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. Thompson v. ReedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Rich's Restaurant v. McFann Enterprises, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Beneficial Commercial Corp. v. Brueck, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API