Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIDDLE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff’s “statement of claim” (complaint), amended under an order of court granting defendant’s motion for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e), Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, alleged that he was injured by the premature explosion of a dynamite cap. Specifically the plaintiff claimed as negligent acts the manufacturing and distributing of the cap “in such a fashion that it was unable to withstand the crimping which defendant knew it would be subjected to”; and distributing a cap so constructed that it would…
2Cited by46 opinions
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Newberg v. American Dryer CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Rogers v. Tri-State Materials Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.