Legal Opinion

Denike v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1914No. 1356PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 34555 (T. D. 34090).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Three sets of engine wheels, carrying their tires and mounted on axles, were sent by the Tcxas-Mexican Railway for repairs to the shops of the National Railways of Mexico, at Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. The wheels and axles were of American manufacture, but the tires were made in Germany, and after importation into this country were fitted to the American wheels. At Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the tires while still on the wheels, were turned, and as a result of the turning the sharpness of the flange and certain flat spots on the tread were removed. No work was done on the wheels or axles. The cost of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Auto Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. Hillhouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Thornley & Pitt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Import Export Service of New Jersey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API