Legal Opinion

United States v. Schoverling

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 7, 1892No. 690PublishedCited by 64 opinions

APPEAL FROM 'THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES .FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohfobd

On the 20th of October, 1890, the firm of Schoverling, Daly & Gales, composed of August Schoverling, Charles Daly and-Joseph Gales, imported into the port of New York, from Europe, articles described in the entry as “ 12 finished gun-stocks, with locks and mountings.” The collector assessed a duty upon them of $1.50 each, and in addition thereto, 35 per cent ad valorem, under paragraph 170 of the act of October 1, 1890, c. 1244, (26 Stat. 579,) in Schedule C of that act, entitled “ Metals and Manufactures of Eire-arms: ” “ 170. All double-barreled, sporting, breech-loading shotguns, valued at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. Robertson v. GerdanSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. United States v. BruckmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API