Legal Opinion

Astra Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 6, 1966No. C.D. 2703PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The importation involved in this protest, invoiced as “Flashlight Tool,” consists of two basic components, a flashlight and a screwdriver set. The collector classified the flashlight component under paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as “flashlights” and, as such, assessed duty thereon at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem. The screwdriver component, consisting of four screwdriver blades and a chuck affixed to a U-shaped bracket, was classified as an entirety under the provisions of paragraph 396, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Hollywood Accessories, Division of Allen Electronics & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  5. Oxford International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API