Robinson v. Southern California Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to recover damages for taking possession of a strip of land one hundred feet wide and constructing thereon a railroad track. Defendant demurred to the com plaint for want of sufficient facts, and also averring that the action is barred by sections 318 and 319, and subdivision 2 of section 338, and subdivision 1 of section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The demurrer was sustained, and, plaintiff declining to amend, defendant had judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.
The complaint sets forth that plaintiff is now, and has been for more than thirteen years last past, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ewing v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Smith v. Chicago, Alton & St. Louis R. R.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Feamster v. WithrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
- Potter v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.