Legal Opinion

Franks v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1993No. 15533PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Defendant, third-party plaintiff-appellant City and County of Honolulu (City) appeals from the orders 1) denying its motion to declare its claim unsuitable for action before the Design Professional Conciliation Panel (DPCP) and 2) granting third-party defendant-appellee Engineers Surveyors Hawaii, Inc.’s (ESH) motion to dismiss the City’s third-party complaint, in which third-party defendant-appellee Soils International (Soils) joined. On appeal, the City asserts it was entitled to move for a determination that its negligence claim against ESH and Soils was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Methven-Abreu v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API