Legal Opinion

In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1980No. 5869PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

Taxpayer, Hawaiian Telephone Company, appeals from the Tax Appeal Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and judgment in favor of the Director of Taxation entered on January 28, 1975, pursuant to HRS § 232-19 (1976). After careful consideration of all questions presented in this appeal, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Hawaiian Telephone Company (hereinafter “Hawaiian Telephone” or “Taxpayer”) is a public utility within the meaning of HRS § 269-1 (1976) (subsequently amended) organized for the purpose of establishing telephone…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Burnet v. LeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State v. KantnerHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. OgataHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Keller v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Leslie v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Coll v. McCarthyHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Puchert v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API