Legal Opinion

Camara v. Agsalud

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1984No. 9156PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

The Third Circuit Court reversed the decision of the referee for unemployment compensation appeals by concluding that Employee Steven M. Camara is qualified to receive unemployment insurance benefits. Employer Big Three Industries filed this appeal. We affirm.

I

The referee’s pertinent findings of fact, which are not in dispute, are as follows:

He [Employee Camara] was discharged by the Employer because he was involved in a traffic accident on November 5, 1981. On that day, he crossed a solid line on the highway while trying to pass a slow moving pick-up…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Talley v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Pickering v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1357 v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API