Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1994No. 16457PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINSON, Justice.

The United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i has certified a question of state law to this court. See Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) 13 (1987).1 In substance, the question is whether Ordinance 91-95 of the City and County of Honolulu,2 relating, inter alia, to residential condominium leasehold conversion, is preempted by Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) chs. 46, 101, 516, 516D, 519, 514A, or 421H, as interpreted in conjunction with the Hawai'i Constitution.

The plaintiffs-appellants William S. Richardson, Henry H. Peters, Oswald K. Stender, Myron B.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API