Legal Opinion

Coon v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2002No. 23246PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LEVINSON, J.

The present matter arises under Revised Ordinances of Honolulu (ROH) ch. 38 (1991). 1 The plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees David Paul Coon, Francis Ahloy Keala, Ronald Dale Libkuman, Constance Hee Lau, and Robert Kalani Uichi Kihune, in them capacities as Trustees of Kamehameha Schools Bishop Estate [hereinafter, “the Trustees”], appeal from the February 9, 2000 final judgment of .the first circuit court, the Honorable Bode A. Uale presiding, entered in favor of the defendant-appellee/cross-appellant City and County of Honolulu [hereinafter, “the City”]…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Querubin v. ThronasHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Durette v. Aloha Plastic Recycling, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Awakuni v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kahale v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API