Daniels Ex Rel. Goodson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence presents the question whether the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is sufficient to justify a verdict in his favor. Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640, 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973). It is well-settled in this State that the presence of children on or near a highway is a warning signal to a motorist, who must bear in mind that children have less capacity to shun danger than adults and they are prone to act on impulse. Therefore, “the presence of children on or near the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Brewer v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Brinson Ex Rel. Brinson v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Badger v. MedleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. RoyallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Colson v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Phillips ex rel. Schultz v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Colson v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.