Colson v. Shaw
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendants’ motions for directed verdict present the question whether the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, is sufficient to justify a verdict in their favor as against either defendant. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). We shall so consider the evidence as it relates to the plaintiffs’ claims of negligence against each defendant separately.
Evidence As to Negligence On The part Of The Defendant Mamie Macon Shaw
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant Shaw was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout, in failing to maintain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Crane v. BannerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Riley v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Daniels Ex Rel. Goodson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dorsey ex rel. Dorsey v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Colson v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Hoffman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994