Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. Royall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge.
The sole question for review is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendants, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50. Motions pursuant to this rule are directed to the sufficiency of the evidence to justify a verdict for the plaintiff when considered in the light most favorable to him. Evans v. Carney, 29 N.C. App. 611, 225 S.E. 2d 157 (1976). Bray v. Dail, 20 N.C. App. 442, 201 S.E. 2d 591 (1974). To determine the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury, all evidence supporting the plaintiff’s claim must…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Fox v. . BarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Brinson Ex Rel. Brinson v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Ingold v. Carolina Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Jolley v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Westbrook v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Sasser Ex Rel. Sasser v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Abell v. Nash County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.