Legal Opinion

Koonce v. May

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1982No. 823SC47PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

A motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. On such a motion, plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. A directed verdict for the defendant is not properly allowed unless it appears as a matter of law that a recovery cannot be had by the plaintiff upon any view of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Overman v. Gibson Products Co. of Thomasville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Everhart v. LeBrunCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Brewer v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Henderson v. Traditional Log Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Hall v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API