Koonce v. May
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
A motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. On such a motion, plaintiffs evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. A directed verdict for the defendant is not properly allowed unless it appears as a matter of law that a recovery cannot be had by the plaintiff upon any view of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Overman v. Gibson Products Co. of Thomasville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Everhart v. LeBrunCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Brewer v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Henderson v. Traditional Log Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Hall v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.