Legal Opinion
Perez v. Nidek Co. Ltd.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 31, 2009No. Case 08cv1261 BTM(JMA)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendant Nidek Incorporated (“Nidek”) has filed a motion to dismiss and/or strike portions of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants Estate of Glenn A. Kawesch, M.D., Gary Kawesch, M.D. Farzad Yaghouti M.D., and John Kownacki, M.D., have filed separate motions to dismiss the SAC. Defendants Manoj V. Motwani, M.D., Keith Liang, M.D., William Ellis, M.D., Randa Garrana, M.D., Joseph Lee, M.D., Linda Vu,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Chavez v. Blue Sky Natural Beverage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Regan v. Sioux Honey Ass'n CooperativeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.