Legal Opinion
In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., Litigation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 13, 2017No. 2:16-cv-2138-HRH (Consolidated with No. 2:16-cv-2373-HRH, No. 2:16-cv-2660-HRH, No. 2:16-cv-2775-HRH and No. 2:16-cv-3599-HRH)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1019ORDER
H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge
Motions to Dismiss
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended consolidated class action complaint.1 The motions to dismiss are opposed.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary.
Background
Plaintiffs are A.R.; B.B.; B.P.; D.L.; L.M.; M.P.; R.C.; R.G.; S.J.; and S.L. A.R. is alleged to be a resident of Califor*1020nia.3 The other plaintiffs are alleged to be residents of Arizona.4 Defendants are Theranos, Inc. (“Theranos”); Elizabeth Holmes; Ramesh Balwani; Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.; and Walgreen Arizona Drug…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- AMATO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Ahern v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Brian Powers v. City of Redwood City, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Fortitude Surgery Center LLC v. Aetna Health IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.