Legal Opinion

Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1976No. 74-940PublishedCited by 6,471 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The McCarran Amendment, 66 Stat. 560, 43 U. S. C. § 666, provides that “consent is hereby given to join the United States as a defendant in any suit (1) for the adjudication of rights to the use of water of a river system or other source, or (2) for the administration of such *803rights, where it appears that the United States is the owner of or is in the process of acquiring water rights by appropriation under State law, by purchase, by exchange, or otherwise, and the United States is a necessary party to such suit.” The questions presented by this case concern the effect of the McCarran…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6,471 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

6,466 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API