Legal Opinion
Rikos v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 4, 2011No. 2:11-mj-00226PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 10)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 15,17).
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AS ALLEGED BY PLAINTIFF
This action arises out of alleged misrepresentations made by Defendant in its marketing and sale of a product known as “Align.” Align is a daily food supplement, which Procter & Gamble claims is made of a special formulation of “probiotic” bacteria that builds and maintains a healthy digestive…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Ferrero LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
- In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Garcia v. Kashi Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.