Legal Opinion
Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 2007No. A06-1000PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent Dale Lee Underdahl was arrested for driving while intoxicated and submitted to a breath test using the Minnesota model of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN (hereinafter, Intoxilyzer 5000EN). At his implied consent hearing, Underdahl made a discovery motion that included, among the items sought, the “complete computer source code for the [Intoxilyzer 5000EN] currently in use in the State of Minnesota.” In granting the motion, the district court ordered that appellant, the Commissioner of Public Safety, provide Underdahl with an operational Intoxilyzer 5000EN instrument and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Jasper v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Anderson v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Kellar v. Von HoltumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & SalmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- City of Fargo v. LevineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.