Legal Opinion
State v. Underdahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 2009No. A07-2293, A07-2428PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Dale Lee Underdahl and Timothy Arlen Brunner (appellants) each sought discovery of the complete computer source code for the Minnesota model of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN in their separate driving while intoxicated (DWI) criminal prosecutions. The district courts in both cases ordered the State to produce the computer source code within 30 days, or the courts would dismiss certain charges and find that the breath test results were not admissible. The State appealed the discovery orders, and the court of appeals consolidated the actions and reversed both orders for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. ObetaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence StavishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. ZaisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.