Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & Salmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1990No. C1-89-1671PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellants are individual partners in the former law firm of Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt and Salmen. The court of appeals by an order dated October 3, 1989, denied their petition for a writ of prohibition, which, if granted, would have restrained a Ramsey County district judge from enforcing an order requiring appellants to respond to discovery requests. The respondents sought to discover the amount of the personal assets of each appellant for use in assessing against each punitive damages for which each might be vicariously liable by virtue of alleged professional…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Hall v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Kellar v. VonHoltumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API