Marriage of Goldman v. Greenwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Appellant Mark Greenwood challenges the decision of the court of appeals reversing the district court’s denial of respondent Deborah Goldman’s motion to remove the parties’ minor child out of state. Appellant argues that the court of appeals erred in ruling that Minn.Stat. § 518.175, subd. 3 (2006), rather than Minn.Stat. § 518.18(d) (2006), governs respondent’s motion for removal and in ruling that respondent is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We agree, and we reverse the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate the district court’s order.
Appellant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (077533) (Sussex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II v. Allina Health SystemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Marriage of Crowley v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Sitek v. StrikerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.