Legal Opinion
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 2002No. C1-00-2098PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
James Jasper’s driver’s license was revoked by the Commissioner of Public Safety because Jasper drove with an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or greater. Jasper petitioned the district court for review of the commissioner’s order of revocation arguing that evidence of his breath-test results was inadmissible because the instrument used to obtain the evidence, the Intoxilyzer 5000, Series 68-01, was not properly approved by the commissioner. The district court sustained the commissioner’s order and the court of appeals affirmed. We affirm.
Jasper was stopped and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Strid v. ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Underdahl v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.