Legal Opinion
Rahm v. Deig
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1889No. 13,966PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Vanderburgh Ciruit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.
— This is an action by the appellee against the appellant on a written contract, which is as follows :
“Evansville, Ind., August 25th, 1886.
“ I have this day sold William Rahm, Jr., my crop of corn, estimated at «thirty-eight hundred and fifty (3,850) bushels (or 1,500 sacks), which I am to shell, fan, sack, and deliver on the Mount Vernon wharf-boat free of storage and charges to steamboats, on or before the fourth day of September next; all’ to be good, sound, merchantable white corn, and put up and delivered, as stated above, in good • order and condition. And I further agree to properly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- First National Bank v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. HascallIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- McCloskey v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.