Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Root

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1886No. 12,197PublishedCited by 40 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchele, J.

The First National Bank of Indianapolis Brought an actipn against Deloss and Jerome B. Root, composing the firm of D. Root & Co. From the averments in the complaint it appears that Deloss Root and D. Root & Co., being largely indebted to the bank, pledged, as collateral security, certain bonds and stocks, taking at the time as evidence of the terms upon which the pledge was made, a paper writing signed by the cashier of. the bank, of the tenor following:

“ Received of D. Root & Co. the following named stocks and bonds, which we are to hold as collateral security for any indebtedness which said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Smith v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Green v. KimbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  5. Hart v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API