Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Thompson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1886No. 12,793PublishedCited by 70 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee seeks a recovery for the death of Andrew Eichler, which is alleged to-have been caused by the negligence of the appellant. It is-charged that the appellee’s intestate was a passenger on one of the appellant’s trains; that because of the negligence of the appellant in constructing and maintaining the bridge-across Blue river, the train went down into the river and Andrew Eichler was killed.

We agree with appellant’s counsel that it must appear from the complaint that the death resulted from the negligent aets charged, for we understand it to be settled law that it…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. International & Great Northern Railroad v. HallorenTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BeggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API