J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Marion Superior Court (93,610); W. W. Thornton, Judge. Action by tbe J. P. Smith Shoe Company against the Curme-Feltman Shoe Company, wherein defendant filed a counterclaim. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.
— This suit was instituted by appellant to recover a balance due for shoes alleged to have been *404sold and delivered to appellee. There are two paragraphs of complaint.. The' first counts upon1 shoes sold and delivered. The second is substantially the same as the first, except it avers a parol contract for the purchase of certain shoes by appellee from appellant with certain modifications thereof during the period- of its fulfillment.
The controverted issues arose upon appellees’ counterclaim filed in two paragraphs. The counterclaim sought to recoup by way of damages (1) for defective shoes…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- American United Life Insurance Company v. PeffleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Baker v. WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Chacker v. MarcusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.