Legal Opinion

Horn v. Indianapolis National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1890No. 13,931PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— It is alleged in the complaint of the appellee that in suits brought by Benjamin F. Horn and James R. Carson against Eber Teter and George Teter, the appellee recovered judgment for $5,080, and that a decree was entered foreclosing a mortgage executed by the Teters to the appellee on four acres of land, with its appurtenances; that on the land was a barrel-heading factory, comprising buildings, engines and machinery. It is also alleged that Horn recovered a judgment for $10,000, and obtained a decree of *383foreclosure; that a copy of this decree was issued to the sheriff, who advertised the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Jackson ex. dem. Merrit v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1827

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Boonville National Bank v. BlakeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. NathanIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gunter v. WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API