Legal Opinion
People v. City of Reedley
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1924No. Civ. No. 2703PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This action was brought in the name of the state of California by the district attorney of Kings County to abate an alleged public nuisance. The nuisance complained of consisted of the discharge, by the city of Reedley, of sewage effluent into Kings River at a point about nine miles from where Kings River crosses the county line between the county of Kings and the county of Fresno. The action was begun in the superior court of the county of Kings and thereafter transferred to the superior court of the county of Tulare for trial.
The complaint sets forth that Kings River is a large natural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Sullivan v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coats v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MottTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Voorheis v. Tidewater Southern Ry. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Jardine v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hassell v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.