Coats v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. T. J. Norton, E. E. Millikin, and U. T. Clotfelter, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of a lot of land in the city of Visalia, fronting on the east side of East Street, on which, from a date anterior to the transactions involved in this case, he had, and had been, operating a foundry and machine-shop and repair-shop for machinery. The defendant is the successor in interest of The San Francisco and San Joaquin Valley Railway Company, and is maintaining in East Street, between the main track of its road and the east line of the street, a side-track erected by its predecessor on an embankment of about two feet elevation, which prevents access to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Martinez v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Williams v. Blue Bird Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.