Sullivan v. Royer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
—This is an action in equity instituted for the purpose of enjoining and abating certain nuisances, and for the recovery of damages resulting therefrom. The cause was tried before a jury, who heard all the evidence given therein, a verdict was by them rendered for one hundred dollars damages against the defendant, “ and that he be ordered by the court to abate the nuisances complained of by the plaintiff.” Thereupon the court made and filed written findings of fact upon all *249the material issues raised by the pleadings, and rendered its judgment, enjoining the defendant from continuing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Sweetser v. DobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Tuebner v. Cal. St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Courtwright v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1866
- People ex rel. Blood v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by36 opinions
- County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. CulverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.