Voorheis v. Tidewater Southern Ry. Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff brought the action to have the defendant railroad corporation restrained from performing certain acts in connection with the operation of its railroad. Defendants filed general and special demurrers to the complaint, which were sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand upon her complaint, and judgment was entered against her for costs, from which judgment she prosecutes this appeal.
The complaint alleged: That plaintiff was and .is a óitizen, 'householder, freeholder, and taxpayer of the city of Modesto, in Stanislaus Countj-; that the defendant, Tidewater Southern Railway Company, is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Blanc v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Thompson v. Kraft Cheese Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. City of ReedleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Fitzgerald v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.